Thursday, April 16, 2009

Southington to discuss banning service on multiple town boards

Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:50 PM EDT

SOUTHINGTON — The Charter Revision Commission moved forward Wednesday night on discussion of a change that would bar anyone from serving on multiple town boards at the same time.

The item was brought to the commission via public comment April 1, and cited as an example service on both the Board of Finance and the Board of Police Commissioners. Charter revision commissioners did not mention Robert Triano (a police commissioner and Board of Finance member) by name Wednesday night, but they cited his situation.

Town attorney Mark Sciota said the charter already prohibits anyone from serving simultaneously on two elected boards. Members of the Board of Finance members are elected; police commissioners are appointed.

Charter Revision Commis-sioners Andrew Meade and Brian Callahan each said having someone on any board with a budget and also on the Board of Finance constitutes a conflict of interest.

Charter Revision Commissioner Dennis Conroy said that if there was a prohibition against serving on more than one board at a time, some of the members of the commission itself might be ineligible. But Sciota said the Charter Revision Commission could craft a proposed change that would apply specifically to the Board of Finance, citing that board’s supervisory role.

Philip Landino warned that a wide-ranging prohibition of multiple board service could leave the town short on board members.

“There are times when you struggle to find people to serve on commissions,” Landino said.

William Knoegel said, though, that if the town promoted a system where more spots became available, more people might step forward to fill them.

The panel voted to move the item from its Schedule A to Schedule B, for more discussion. As with any item on the commission’s agenda, this one could be dismissed at any time. When items reach Schedule C, Sciota begins working on language for a proposed charter change.

The Charter Revision Commission also voted 7-5 (with one member missing) to table at Schedule B a proposed change that would bar any member of the Town Council from holding any other city office or city employment during his or her term. Sciota said such a change would not stand up to a legal challenge, but commission member Richard Post prevailed, arguing that the issue needed more study before it could be dismissed.

The Charter Revision Commission has no legislative or regulatory power. If a proposed charter revision reaches Schedule D and is approved by the panel, it moves on to consideration by the Town Council. Any changes to the town charter would ultimately be decided in referendum.

Why not Brookfield?

Milford schools float giveback or furlough

MILFORD — The Board of Education floated several ideas for concessions to its unions, including giving back 1 percent of next year’s raises for a savings of about $600,000, or a one-day furlough for a $290,000 savings, sources said.

School board Chairman David Hourigan, D-4, confirmed the school board met with representatives of about 1,000 employees Tuesday and Wednesday to discuss possible cost-saving measures. He declined to elaborate, saying the talks were private.

“There were no proposals made, but there were discussions about various scenarios depending on what the Board of Aldermen does on May 6,” Hourigan said.

But sources said
school board members asked unions to consider possibly giving back 1 percent of their raises effective July 1 to save $600,000, and broached the idea that if every school employee were to take a day off with no pay, it would generate $300,000 in savings.

On average, teachers will receive a 4.8 percent pay increase next year, but only about 100 of first- and second-year teachers actually receive a raise that high, as teachers with more experience get a 3 percent increase. School custodians are scheduled to get a 3 percent raise next year.

Sources said the unions essentially told school board members the bargaining units all have contracts and they expect the board to honor those agreements. Union officials also told board members that, unlike most city employees, they contribute to their health care costs, saving taxpayers $1.9 million for this year alone.

Board members told union members layoffs would be a “last resort,” and the discussions were cordial. The school board did not say the 1 percent givebacks or furloughs were specifically proposed, as that could change if aldermen further cut the budget in May.

The school board reduced its proposed $83 million budget by $800,000, and at the time said that would lead to cuts of up to 10 staff positions, including five media aide positions.

The Board of Finance last month trimmed another $817,950 from the school board proposal, which could mean more positions could be eliminated.

A school union member, who asked not to be identified, said city unions have gotten a lot of attention because of “concessions” they agreed to, including taking no increase next year. However, the school union member said the city unions did not agree to real concessions because their contract expired at the end of this year, and the new contract was agreed to as part of the negotiation process. Five of eight city unions agreed to not take a raise next year, saving taxpayers $850,000. The savings is based on the fact that all city unions were slated to receive a 2.5 percent increase.

The biggest unknown in the concession talks is that the district is expecting to receive money through the federal stimulus package. It’s been estimated the total could range from $2 million to $5 million over two years, but officials said it’s unclear how the money will be distributed, and how it can be spent. School officials said they hope to use some of the money to offset staff reductions.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Brookfield looks to bar deficient vendors
Process provides for performance evaluations, hearings

By BOB UPHUES
Editor

At its meeting April 13, the Brookfield village board voted to adopt a new ordinance that will allow the village to disqualify from any competitive bidding process contractors who fail to measure up.

Village Manager Riccardo Ginex introduced the measure in late March, saying the new law would "promote integrity in the village's contracting processes and protect the public interest."

"We've had some issues," said Ginex in a separate interview. "We wanted to find out how we could restrict these guys from working here, especially if they bid on contracts and have the low bid. What can we do?"

Most notably, Brookfield ended up in court with one of its contractors for a street improvement project back in 2003. Then in 2006, the village was sued by a concrete contractor after its low bid for another street project was rejected by Brookfield trustees after staff noted a number of lawsuits against the contractor throughout the years. Both suits were dismissed, according to court records.

According to the text of the new ordinance, the village manager will be responsible for determining whether a vendor should be barred from bidding on village contracts. It also provides for a performance evaluation process in which the village manager rates firms doing work with the village on several criteria, from the quality of work to the vendor's willingness to resolve contract disputes and respond to reasonable requests from village officials.

"Looking at the ordinance, it comes about when we have a lot of complaints or significant issues," Ginex said. There are no specific contractors the village is targeting with this legislation, Ginex added.

A contractor can also be barred from bidding on work if it has been determined that the contractor has violated contract terms or has been suspended or barred by any state or federal agency, has filed for bankruptcy protection or has been convicted of any state or federal law relating to his reliability as a contractor.

Before ruling that a vendor should be barred from seeking village contracts, the village manager would be required to inform that company why the village seeks to bar him and then hold a hearing where both sides can present evidence and witnesses.

After the hearing, the village manager will make a recommendation to the village board, which will have the final say on whether to bar a vendor. The length of time a contractor would be prohibited from seeking government contracts would depend on the severity of the problem, but could be permanent.

Tumult at Riverside-Brookfield
These are some remarkable days at Riverside Brookfield High School.

In a decisive vote, taxpayers last week tossed two school board incumbents while electing a slate that promises significant change.

That vote came immediately on the heels of the resignation of Superintendent/Principal Jack Baldermann, who had to go. He took an option a new board would most certainly have demanded, possibly on less favorable exit terms.

What's next? There seems to be agreement among members of both the current and future boards that the school must choose interim administrators to run RB next year. Baldermann's departure this late in the school year, coupled with the inevitable learning curve of a new board majority, makes interim appointments as principal and, separately, as superintendent the wise course.

At issue is which board - old or new - makes the choices. The sitting board seems ready to argue that making the appointments quickly makes the most sense: School would be more stable for next year. Members of the new board argue that given the new direction demanded by voters, and that mandate seems real to us, such key choices as interim leaders must be made by the newly constituted school board.

We agree with the newcomers. Voters have chosen change. Picking interim administrators should be the new board's first notable choice.

A caution: Being elected to office by your neighbors is a heady experience. Being given a mandate is a particular trust offered only rarely by voters. The tendency, our experience tells us, is for newly elected officials with that powerful wind at their backs to overreach, to oversimplify. Riverside Brookfield is a fine high school, a place of accomplishment and tradition. Voters want you to fix its problems, not remake it. Take time to see the grays. RB is complex. Few issues there are black and white.

 

Thank God for Tony Peraica

Our elected officials are so darned smart. And they really have our interests at heart! So it is just fine with us that Tony Peraica, among other things the Lyons Township Republican committeeman, cut a deal with his Democratic counterpart to make sure there were just enough candidates on the ballot for the township race last week. A sprinkling of Republicans. A slightly heavier sprinkling of Democrats. And no pesky extra candidates for voters to have to worry their stupid little heads over. It was just so neat and tidy.

Just a few weeks ago, the race for the township was almost gaudy with a fine little dust-up between Peraica and his GOP nemesis Michael LaPidus. Their fight was confusing to us. Made our heads hurt. Luckily, the courts sided with LaPidus and tossed Peraica's slate. But Peraica came back and ditched four of his candidates, renominated three, cut a deal with the Dems on the other four seats.

That made it simple for voters. Seven candidates. Seven posts. Thanks, Uncle Tony.

An alternative Brookfield in the middle of America

The old-school way the school board race was won Victorious RB candidates used shoe leather and money to triumph
By BOB SKOLNIKContributing Reporter

Mike Welch and Dan Moon each rang about 1,200 doorbells in their campaign for seats on the Riverside Brookfield High School District 208 school board. One thing they found out talking to voters is that it wasn't always so important who they were, what mattered most was who they were not.
"One of the questions they asked was 'are you the incumbent' and when I said no several people would answer 'well that's good enough for me,'" Welch recalled a few days after the election.
Welch, Moon, and Matt Sinde rode unhappiness over recent controversies at RB to a convincing victory knocking off two incumbents and independent candidate Eric Duve on their way to a solid victory capturing all thee seats at stake on the school board in last week's election.
Talking to voters Welch said it became clear that many were unhappy with events at RB over the last year. Much of the displeasure was centered on RB Superintendent/Principal Jack Baldermann and on school finances.
"When I went door-to-door there's not one door that asked the ultimate question, 'this board's doing a good job, why should we hire you'" Welch said. "When I went door-to-door the two names that came up most often were Jack Baldermann and [school board president] Larry Herbst. That's what the community was telling us."
Some were impressed that a candidate would knock on their door.
"One gentleman said that no one had ever come to his home in 40 years for the school board," Welch said.
But it wasn't just ringing door bells that won the race for Welch, Sinde, and Moon, who ran as a team and called themselves the SWiM team.
Their campaign was well funded and well organized. It had roots in the school board campaign two years ago of Jim Marciniak, Chris Robling and David Hilpp who also ran as a team. Although Marciniak was the only one of the three to get elected from that slate, many of the same people who supported Marciniak, Robling and Hilpp, most notably former Riverside village trustee Jerry Buttimer, supported Welch, Sinde and Moon this time around.
Although Buttimer tried to stay in the background and likes to minimize his role in the campaign he clearly was a key organizer and strategist in the campaign. The victory party for Welch, Sinde and Moon was held in the well appointed basement of Buttimer's beautiful Riverside home.
Buttimer helped recruit Sinde to the campaign. Sinde, a Brookfield resident, played an important part in the campaign.
Although Sinde, the long time chairman of the Brookfield Zoning Board of Appeals, could not campaign door to door like Welch and Moon because he is still recovering from hip replacement surgery last year, he brought deep Brookfield roots and political connections that Riverside residents Welch and Moon lacked.
In addition to the door to door campaigning, which was concentrated in Brookfield and other areas of the district where Welch and Moon were unknown, the three winners appeared before about two dozen community groups including Kiwanis, Rotary clubs and PTA's to spread their message. They visited the British Home to seek the votes of seniors.
With drive, money, and a community upset about events at RB Welch, Sinde and Moon overwhelmed their dispirited opposition. Incumbents Laura Hruska and Karen Bensfield did little campaigning and spent no money. Bensfield, who finished fourth, was aided by the support of the VIP party on her home turf of North Riverside where she racked up big margins but it wasn't enough to overcome the huge margins Welch, Sinde and Moon racked up in Riverside and their smaller margins in Brookfield.
Bensfield said that the controversies about Baldermann were tough for her to overcome. "Every thing with him was a big part of the election." Bensfield said.
She said that she doubted if anything she could have done would have made much of a difference in the outcome. "There was so much negative press, just about RB in general, for the last what month, two months," Bensfield said. "I looked at it like the national election. They were going to get rid of the old and bring in the new."
Eric Duve tried to position himself as an independent candidate, but he was overwhelmed and finished last. He said that the Improve- RB candidates may have raised the standard of what it takes to win an RB school board race.
"I spent a grand total of $30 for printer ink and I now realize I didn't have a chance, no matter how qualified I was," Duve said. "I'm not bitter, I'm not angry. They were well organized and well financed."
Welch, Sinde and Moon did spend money, more money than in any recent District 208 race. They formed a political committee called Improve - RB and raised more than $2,000 for the campaign. Welch, an I.R.S. agent assigned to the United State's Attorney's office said he kicked in about $1,200 of his own money for the campaign.
"I thought it was that important that if I were to be involved I would be committed to doing the right thing and running a good campaign," Welch said.
Moon said that he contributed $600 to Improve - RB and spent perhaps a couple hundred dollars more on supplies. Sinde declined to say how much he contributed.
"I'd like to hold off until we get all the bills paid," Sinde said.
Stan Czerwien, the treasurer of Improve - RB campaign committee, and the man who brought Sinde to Buttimer's attention, said on Sunday that he was aware of about $2,100 in contributions and about $1,500 in spending on the campaign but said that all the bills have not been paid and more contributions may still need to be collected. The Improve - RB committee was formed in March, but didn't file its report with the Illinois State Board of Elections until April 8, the day after the election.